2017. 2. 23. 13:39ㆍArchitectural Studies/History & Theory
Photography has been used to represent the image of architecture. In fact, it is the most of way to see architecture since it has more accessibility that physically visit to site to explode. However, in the process of reproduce the work, it tends to lose the concept of authenticity from actual art works. Moreover photography captures the certain views from photographer instead of the present of the original. Because in process of reproduction is more independent from the original than manual reproduction. In case of photography, process reproduction can bring out those aspects of the original that are unattainable to the naked eye yet accessible to the lens, which is adjustable and chooses its angle at will.
Art form/organization of perception at the time.
Since the development of technology, the artists have various multiple option of the medium to choose for interpret their perception. The change in the medium of contemporary art effects deferring the comprehension of art from the aura to the perception. The aura in art is experienced with the present of original that emits its features. This experience could be different to every observers as the feeling or interpretation could be differently perceived. On the other hand, reproduction of original could The desire of contemporary masses to bring things ‘closer’ spatially and humanly, which is just as ardent as their bent toward overcoming the uniqueness of every reality by accepting its reproducing. Never working directly with the object of their thought, always the drawing, while painter and sculptors, who might spend some time on preliminary sketches and maquettes, all ended up working on the thing itself which, naturally, absorbed most of their attention and effort. It is all too clear that this new intimacy would first require a divorce because as we gained more direct access to the work, we would be relinquishing claim to the architecture that now flourishes within the political, economic and social order. If architecture were redefined in this way, it might become more scrupulous and less responsible smaller and less predictable worth grandiose pretensions to represent and define the social world in both its imaginative and active aspects. All the same quite easy to understand and appreciate shince it has to do with observers not being able to believe their own eyes. The result of direct observation of the play of electric light on while painted surfaces and countless expresences in situ, they cannot be adequately illustrated ot photography after their constuction and there is noway that even the vaguest hint of their effort could have originated though drawing.
'Architectural Studies > History & Theory' 카테고리의 다른 글
6.8운동과 현대건축 그리고 전환기의 한국건축 (0) | 2017.02.23 |
---|---|
MODERN ABSTRACT (0) | 2017.02.23 |
LANGUAGE OF VISION (0) | 2017.02.23 |
'비평'의 의미와 가치 (0) | 2017.02.23 |
“transparency” (0) | 2017.02.23 |